|
 (Moyland fax, Oct 9th, 1997)
|
1997, 30th of Sept: HET PAROOL, Coos van de Wetering: INGLORIOUS END ON REFUSE DUMP MENACES ARTIST'S ARCHIVE: "eviction within fourteen days, as the city demands, would mean the end of his life's work... The chances are therefore great that the archive will end on the rubbish dump. According to the American art historian WaIter Hopps from Houston the work of Kloppenburg surely is a MEGASCULPTURE OF SIGNIFICANT VALUE. It could be compared to the Merz archive by Kurt Schwitters and the archive of Yves Klein, who also took as a starting point the beauty of consumer goods. Works that were lost as well ... Also in Germany the true value of the Archive is discerned. The German art collector and museum director Hans van der Grinten considers sheltering it in the German museum castle Moyland. This museum also houses works of Joseph Beuys, an artist to whom Kloppenburg feels akin. ("B") ...The archive has been there for thirty years already. Previously the attic was the depot store for the Wagner Association. The attic has contained inflammable things for many a year and day therefore, but that does not mean that there is a fire hazard. There are ten thousands of attics in Amsterdam with old rubbish: is the city going to evict them all?
1997, 3rd of October: News item about the threat of compulsory eviction of the ARCHIVE FOR THE FUTURE, AT5, broadcast on television (F.I.U.archive).
1997, 3rd of October: Letter from Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam to broadcasting network SBS6 in which the Museum stresses the importance of The Archive and points to the fact that, during the eighties, it was even exhibited in Museum Fodor (part of the Stedelijk Museum), which is subsidised by the city of Amsterdam (F.I.U.archive).
1997, 7th of October: The OBJECTION against the eviction of the ARTCHlVE FOR THE FUTURE is not sustained by the Court of Justice Amsterdam, department Administrative Law.
(Reg.No. A WB 97/10293 GEMWT)
1997, 9th of October: TELEFAX, sent 10.58h by; Stiftung Museum Schloss Moyland Sammlung van der Grinten, Hans van der Grinten (Museum director) to; THE MAYOR (SCHELTO PATIJN, Red.) AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMSTERDAM, to the attention of the ALDERMAN for CULTURAL AFFAIRS, Mr. E.C. BAKKER, 0031 20 5522380 URGENT ..."Concerning threat of eviction of atelier Kloppenburg; ...Dear Council, dear Mr. Bakker, It came to our attention that the city of Amsterdam plans to evict, because of a fire hazard, on very short notice the atelier of the artist Kloppenburg. We are aware that, on basis of a legal judgement, the lease contract between mister Kloppenburg and the owner of the building that houses his atelier, will be terminated as of January the 1st of next year. For our museum, that was reason to search with the greatest speed for a possibility to house the most important part of the content of the atelier Kloppenburg somewhere else".
An Important consideration in this respect is, that we are dealing with an artwork, the so called "Archive for the Future", which according to our positive conviction possesses an important art-historical value. The loss of this "Archive", unless carefully and expertly transported would be unavoidable, and mean the loss of important valuable cultural heritage, a loss impossible to restore. In the meantime we have found a possibility to house the "Archive" of Kloppenburg. The organisational details and the co-ordination with current affairs of a large museum institute as ours, do not allow us to carry out the packaging and transportation from one day to the next. We assume though, that we are capable of handling this before the date on which above mentioned lease contract comes to an end, that is to say, before the end of this calendar year. WE STRONGLY REQUEST YOU, TO AVOID THE WORK OF KLOPPENBURG BEING IRREPARABLY DESTROYED > THE FACT THAT ONLY A FEW MORE WEEKS SEPARATE US FROM A REGULAR AND PROFESSIONAL EVICTION MAY BE REASON FOR YOU TO ABANDON THE PLAN OF A DISASTROUS IMMEDIATE EVICTION. With Regard, Hans van der Grinten, director.
1997, 9th of October: TELEFAX,, sent by J.G. van Leeuwen (Head External Services A’dam Muniscip.) to Ron Manheim Museum Schloss Moyland, URGENT : Dear Sir. Today we communicated about the clearance of the fifth and sixth floor of Lauriergracht 109. I HAVE REPORTED TO YOU THAT IN CASE OF A MUNICIPLE CLEARENCE WE WILL ACT WITH UTMOST CARE AND ATTENTION as always. I have given you the opportunity to be present during the clearence. The clearence is planned for Tuesday October 14th. 9 a.m. We agreed that you will let us know cn Monday if you will be present, also that the starting time of the operation can be changed to 10 a.m., if you so request in connection with your traveling chedule. Waiting to hear from you, Respectfully yours, Signed: J.G. van Leeuwen.
1997, 10th of October: TELEFAX, sent 09.51h, by Ron Manheim, Adjunct Director Museum Schloss Moyland, to the city of Amsterdam, Dienst Binnenstad, J.G. van Leeuwen;... "Unfortunately we are unable on such short notice to send one of our own specialists to be present on October the 14th to professionally supervise the eviction commanded by you. ... We hereby grand permission though, to mister Patrick Healy, Professor at the Free International University, who resides in Amsterdam this year as a guest and is doing extensive research on the life and work of Kloppenburg, as a pre-eminent expert on his oeuvre, to see to an eviction and packing which are art-historically as responsible as possible. Self evidently, the authority of the Artist will remain unhampered if he would be present at the eviction. A complication though is that Prof. Healy is currently in Oxford to give lectures and we have so far been unable to contact him. After a temporary storage under your care we will provide storage in our museum in December, as we await a museum presentation. We once more bring to your attention the fact that the "Archive for the Future" is a coherent artwork, which does not allow its parts to be judged separately. This fact also means that EVEN IF GREAT CARE IS TAKEN BY A COMPANY THAT HAS NO DAILY EXPERIENCE WITH ART TRANSPORTATION, SERIOUS DAMAGE IS TO BE FEARED. Therefore I have to stress once more that, in our opinion packaging and transportation should be postponed, carefully prepared and carried out by experts in the field of art. We hope and trust the Amsterdam Municipality will be assigned a worthy place in the annals of art history, also with regard to her conduct in the Kloppenburg case! This concerns a work of which people in the future will say that something eminently important has unfortunately been lost .. or .. they will honour the municipality of Amsterdam for saving a remarkable specimen of national and international cultural heritage from perdition. Meanwhile we have been informed that judicial steps have been undertaken in order to attempt to postpone the eviction for a little longer, which would enable us to organise professional art transport and storage"… (F.I.U.archive).
ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST
NOTE: During the weeks preceding the eviction everything is working at full speed. One can read it all in Kloppenburg's sketchbooks or 'scripts'. The main problem is solved: the TRASHTHETICAL LITTERARTURE concept is finished. Kloppenburg has been working on it day and night, having read his way through all the books of Rudolf Steiner once again. He has even managed to make a sonnet out of it, 14 lines in total. At the bicycle maker he has picked up some broken tubes, black, a full bundle at once. The hermetic circles are opened, circumference becomes line. These become the lines of text on which the completed concept in his own alphabet, the Kloppenburg REDUCTION ALPHABET, is applied line for line in white letters, exactly as it started in the forties, somewhere at the beginning of this text. He works on it with the strongest dedication imaginable. It 'has to' be finished. Kloppenburg's lifework, his sculpture ARTCHIVE FOR THE FUTURE, cannot possibly be moved without the author having stated and explained with the utmost precision his concept, his rules and the rights following from them, a final signature. It works: at the very last moment, in the night before the eviction, the initiation text lines are spread out over the archive parts. The Gesamtkunstwerk ARTCHlVE FOR THE FUTURE has been 'sealed'. The explanatory text is back 'on the beams' of the lightoracle, exactly as it was in 1943, at his first acquaintance with the Wagner depot. The initiationcabin. VISIBLE LANGUAGE OF A CULTURE ... ARTSCIOUSNESS QUOTIENT UPGRADING... After 56 years of research, The Kloppenburg oracle speaks, just in time, and in unmistakable language and imagery. In The Archive that same evening, he gives a detailed explanation about affairs during a completely relaxed interview with Geert Jan Berkhof which is recorded on video. It is the same KIoppenburg who, as a boy, would enter the school at the very last moment and reach out his hand at sunbeams, and who would catch the train when it had actually already left (F.l.U.archive).

1997, 10th of Oct: Request for temporal provision presented to the President of the Court of Justice Amsterdam. NOTE: A last attempt to escape from immediate eviction by means of a legal judgement. Court case on Monday the 13th of October. Bien is abroad until Thursday the 18th of Oct. and can not attend the court case. Patrick Healy, ditto, is giving lectures in Oxford.
1997, 13th of Oct (Monday): Court case. Present; Jacobus Kloppenburg, his lawyer Mr Joop Seegers, various representatives of the city of Amsterdam (video registration by Oeke Hogendijk). Pronounced Judgement: "The President dismisses the request." In the verdict it is stated explicitly; >>> "...That the defence (City of Amsterdam) has announced that "ALL POSSIBLE CARE WILL BE TAKEN AT THE EVICTION and... "MOREOVER IT HAS BECOME PLAUSIBLE THAT THE DEFENDANT (City of Amsterdam) WILL CARRY OUT THE EVICTION WITH THE NECESSARY METICULOUSNESS' <<<
NOTE: When the City of Amsterdam makes the twice mentioned 'promise of uttermost care' to the Court of Justice, the EVICTION ORDER has already been given to DEMOLITION COMPANY SCHMIDT.
1997, 14th of Oct (Tuesday) 07.00h: Start of eviction by the firm Schmidt, specialising in demolition and laying down ground works, with the help of the firm Saan (Royal). Official Eviction Report. NOTE: The Report was written on the 12th of April 2000. During the eviction itself, no report was written.
Citing from: liability claim directed at the City of Amsterdam, of April the 18th 2002 ... by Mr. DOLF RUEB, Kloppenburg's lawyer:
>>>THE EVICTION: This turned out to be assigned to the firm A.H.H. Schmidt, specialised in demolition and laying down ground works (official Chamber of Commerce Registration), assisted by 6 or 7 people of the removal firm Saan, which also supplied the containers. As promised Kloppenburg was allowed to be present during the eviction, but he was not allowed any possibility to give instructions or advice. Other interested people were also told that they should not interfere with anything; they were even forbidden to take photographs or to film the proceedings. The eviction squad would only listen to the municipal inspector of the Bouwtoezicht on duty. In the notification as well as in the written order of the 23rd of October 1997, there is only mention of the removal of inflammable objects and fabrics from the floors. In reality though both floors were completely emptied without any distinction between inflammable and non-inflammable materials. Together with mentioned artworks therefore, large quantities of non-inflammable materials, such as printing presses, machines, car doors, glass, rocks, and other construction material, were have been jammed into the containers. The mentioned artworks, that are not meant to be carelessly stacked in containers, were already damaged due to the storage in the containers and, as appeared to be the case, they were even further damaged during transport and storage. Despite the prohibition on filming ordered by the city, the affairs concerning the transferral of the content of both floors to the containers is sufficiently documented to illustrate that the manner in which the artworks are "carried off" did not take place according to the care promised by the municipality and certainly not with the care that would suit the artworks at stake." End of quotation.
KLOPPENBURG HAS PERSONALLY PHOTOGRAPHlCALLY RECORDED THE EVICTION IN MULTIPLE FINAL PHOTO SEQUENCES AND DOUBLE EXPOSURES (F.I.U.archive).

ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST GO ON ART MUST
The work on the eviction concludes on Friday the 17th of Oct. 15.47h; Weekend. One minute later Pelikaan construction workers, now completely unhindered, start continuing the further realisation of the luxurious apartments. Against all regulations the civil servants did not make an official report of the eviction. Recordings of the eviction are broadcast by AT5 TV.
1997, 18th of October: HET PAROOL, "ATELIER KLOPPENBURG EVICTED ON ORDERS OF THE CITY DUE TO FIRE HAZARD" "...his thousands of objects, known as the Archive for the Future, are stored in boxes and will be moved to Moyland in December... K had lost the second lawsuit he had instituted against the eviction".
1997, 19th of October: Letter from Bien/Healy/Hofstede, FlU, to the Mayor and Alderman of Amsterdam, with the suggestion to remove the words HELDHAFTIG (Heroic) and BARMHARTIG (Charitable) from the city-arms (unanswered). NOTE: the city-arms of Amsterdam consist of three vertically placed Andreas crosses and the text; Heldhaftig, Barmhartig and Volhardend (Persistent).
ART IS GOING ON ART IS GOING ON ART IS GOING ON ART IS ART GOING ON ART IS
1997 November: Visit with Bien to the USA, Grotfeldt's exhibition at Jason Mc Coy Gallery, NY, Nov 4th. At the request of Kloppenburg, director Steven Cadwalader has taken a series of Brancusi photographs from the depot so that they can be looked at more closely. Furthermore: FlU meetings and visits to Grotfeldt's studio. In NY, Kloppenburg, Bien, Virgil and Deborah Grotfeldt are the guests of Luk and Barbara Darras (Consul General of Belgium). Afterwards they go to HOUSTON TX, for meetings with WaIter Hopps and a visit to the PROJECT ROW HOUSE which Deborah Grotfeldt and Rick Lowe have erected; the transformation of last row of ‘Free Man’ barracks from the post slavery days, ready for demolition, into an internationally appraised social cultural centre for the black society, a prototype of SOCIAL SCULPTURE IN THE USA. Grotfeldt is exhausted by the production, exhibition and opening, something one would also expect of Kloppenburg after what has happened in Amsterdam over the last few months. But he is full of energy and, while eating, he immediately starts working. The eating itself is an integral part of the artwork: ART MUST GO ON. At the kitchen sink of Grotfeldt's studio, Heights Blvd 1226, Kloppenburg creates ARTVOCADORUNEN (see note 1990), on the pages of a Houston telephone book that was found on the streets, while Hopps and the Grotfeldts are watching (F.I.U.archive). He collects and dries plants. Within the framework of annual work meetings that have been going on since 1994 between Bien and Grotfeldt, or meetings in which collaborate artworks originate, some 200 or more already, so-called 'collaborations in open framework', Kloppenburg participates in this work session in Houston (Meeting 6, 17-28 November, the Heights); It is an important moment within this Bien-Grotfeldt series and a spiritual crash-test for the FlU open framework idea: All paintings that have been made so far, have as a common denominator an 'open' frame, a frame with 3 sides in stead of the usual 4, in order to visualise that one is not dealing here with a closed private meeting between two artists, but with an 'open conversation' in which others are also able to participate. For the first time this can now be put in practise and examined. In this manner, by way of an F.I.U. test case, a collaborate work emerges, a 'triptych with equal parts', every part of which is put together from three unequal parts. The tripartite context is possibly a reference to the SOCIAL TRIPARTITION of Rudolf Steiner. The motto of his Social Ethic being: THE HEALTHY SOCIAL LIFE IS FOUND WHEN IN THE MIRROR OF EACH HUMAN SOUL THE WHOLE COMMUNITY FINDS ITS REFLECTION, AND WHEN IN THE COMMUNITY THE VIRTUE OF EACH ONE IS LIVING. (See: Waldo Bien, by Patrick Healy, Wienand Verlag, Köln, 2000, or the book about Virgil Grotfeldt, also Wienand.) Meetings with Terrell James, Meredith M. Jack, Richard Stout, Charles Stagg, Jeff Nixon, Weihong (all FIUWAC ) and others. (F.I.U.archive).
1997, 25th of Nov: Kloppenburg receives a BILL of Hfl. 71.245,74 from the City of Amsterdam for "THE REMOVAL OF THE INFLAMMABLE FABRICS AND OBJECTS" from The Archive, to be paid within 8 days, 1st threat of DESTRUCTION if the bill is not paid.
1997, 4th of Dec: Visit of Hans van der Grinten and Ron Manheim to Lauriergracht 123, F.I.U. Amsterdam. Work discussion about the further course of affairs. Recordings: Babeth Mondini VanLoo and Oeke Hogendijk (F.I.U.archive).
|
 The laureate
|